Tuesday, June 10, 2008
SWOP homepageBill O'Reilly thinks we're a threat!
His on-air bully Bill O'Reilly called the conference attendees "crazy" and "fascist" --- you, me, and the millions of others who want media reform. These people are "doing a lot of damage to America," O'Reilly yelled. Our crime? Calling for journalism that's more honest, just and accountable to the public.
When Bill O'Reilly goes after you, you must be doing something right. So we've decided to return the favor, and tell him two things: (1) Thanks so much for the compliment and (2) please stop pretending to be a journalist.
Tell Bill O'Reilly: Stop Pretending to Be a Journalist
Labels: Bill O'Reilly, Media, Media Bias, media justice, media reform, NCMR2008
Saturday, April 19, 2008
SWOP homepageFNS: Mexican Journalists Still Under Siege in 2008
Human Rights NewsDespite the creation of a special federal prosecutor and protests from virtually all international press organizations, new attacks against journalists in Mexico continue to mount while old ones go unpunished. Two young radio announcers from the southern state of Oaxaca are the latest journalists to suffer violent deaths. Felicitas Martinez, 22, and Teresa Bautista, 24, were shot to death in an ambush April 7 while on their way to cover a state meeting of indigenous peoples. Four other persons were wounded in the attack, including two young children aged 2 and 3. As of April 19, no suspects had been arrested for the crimes.
Indigenous Triquis, Martinez and Bautista were announcers for the “The Voice that Breaks the Silence” community radio station in San Juan Copala, a town which has enjoyed autonomous status since early 2007. Outspoken commentators in a region riddled with social conflicts, Martinez and Bautista allegedly suffered threats before their murders. “Some people think we are very young to know, but they should know we are very young to die,” Martinez and Bautista reportedly said on the air shortly before their deaths.
Alfonso Ortiz, radio station coordinator, blamed a group connected with the PRI state government of Ulises Ruiz for the killings of his colleagues. Ortiz also accused the state government of attempting to bribe family members of Martinez and Bautista into silence. Oaxaca State Secretary Manuel Garcia Corpus, who earlier met with the victims’ survivors, said a truce was necessary between warring political factions in the region.
Oaxaca State Attorney General Evencio Martinez (no known relation to the victim) said the radio announcers were in the wrong place at the wrong time. “What's clear from the preliminary investigation is that the attack wasn’t against them, but against the person who was driving the vehicle,” Martinez said. The presumed target of the attack, in the state attorney general’s view, was Faustino Vasquez, a local government employee who was hospitalized with a gunshot wound to his left arm.
Earlier, the San Juan Copala radio station demanded that Mexico’s Office of the Federal Attorney General take over the murder investigation.
The Martinez-Bautista murders were condemned by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Mexican Episcopal Conference and the World Association of Community Radio Broadcasters (AMARC), among other organizations.
AMARC representative Aleida Calleja said Mexico was already dangerous territory for communicators but that the murders of the two young indigenous women “added to it.” In a statement, the UN’s human rights ombudsman contended that “only through the effective clarification” of the Martinez-Bautista slayings will similar attacks against journalists and social communicators be prevented.
Mexico´s official human rights commission is investigating the Oaxaca murders, while the AMARC has announced it will dispatch an international investigative delegation to the country between April 21-25.
In northern Mexico, another media outlet has also suffered aggressions. Readers of the daily El Cinco newspaper in Ciudad Victoria, Tamaulipas, have had a difficult time getting the news lately because of an escalating wave of intimidation that culminated April 16 in the kidnapping of the paper’s pressman by alleged members of the Tamaulipas state police force. Quoted in the Apro news service, El Cinco’s management added that other workers were threatened with guns. Copies of the paper which managed to make it onto the streets were then reportedly bought out by unnamed individuals offering higher-than-normal prices to vendors. There was no immediate word of the fate of the kidnapped pressman. Prior to the armed invasion of the printing facility, editions of the newspaper had allegedly been confiscated by state policemen at different intersections in Ciudad Victoria.
In the northern Mexican border community of Agua Prieta, Sonora, meanwhile, about 60 friends and relatives of murdered journalist Saul Noe Martinez staged a protest last week on the first anniversary of his killing, which like the vast majority of murders of journalists in Mexico remains unsolved. The editor of Interdiario, Martinez was kidnapped from an Agua Prieta police station by armed gunmen; his body was later found in the neighboring state of Chihuahua. Demonstrators demanded the speeding up of the murder investigation, and that Martinez’s name be cleared of allegations that cocaine was found along with his body. According to Martinez’s supporters, the substance in question was rat poison.
Speaking out on the Oaxaca murders, UNESCO General Director Koichiro Matsuura called the killings of journalists “an odious crime that causes great damage to society, since it suffocates the democratic right of the citizens to debate issues of common interest…”
Sources: Aguas/EFE, April 18, 2008. Proceso/Apro, April 17 and 19, 2008. Articles by Pedro Matias. Cimacnoticas, April 17 and 18, 2008. Articles by Soledad Jarquin Edgar, Susana Trejo de Jesús and Jessica Cecilia Martinez. Pagina 24/Apro, April 17, 2008. CNN en Español/Aristegui, April 16, 2008. La Jornada, April 9, 12 and 17, 2008. Articles by Matilde Perez U., Carolina Gomez, Ulises Gutierrez, Emir Olivares, Octavio Velez, and the AFP news agency.
Frontera NorteSur (FNS): on-line, U.S.-Mexico border news
Center for Latin American and Border Studies
New Mexico State University
Las Cruces, New Mexico
For a free electronic subscription email fnsnews@nmsu.edu
Monday, April 14, 2008
SWOP homepageThis Just In: Satirist of Sensationalist News Gets (Kinda') Bumped by Sensationalist News
That's right. Following a few days of promo for Stephen Colbert's appearance on Larry King Live, the satirist of sensationalist news loses 30 minutes of air time to, well, sensationalist news. Just another one of life's great ironies...Stephen Colbert
Larry King
Labels: Media, Media Bias
Sunday, April 06, 2008
SWOP homepageFor Latino Guv "Judas" Has More Legs than "Candidate"
The popular online research engine Nexis/Lexis found 62 stories (GoogleNews brought back 279) using the search terms "Bill Richardson" and "Judas".
Mediaaccuracy.org's analysis of the Democratic Primary adds to the discussion.
Perpetuating Racial Divides: Media Coverage of the Democratic Party Nominees and the Latino VoteThis post is far from a defense of Richardson, most know we've had more disagreements than agreements with the Guv over the years. Just more evidence that a movement for media justice and vigilance are essential if all social movements are to expand the public debate in the service of democracy, equality and justice.
While mainstream media have covered candidates’ pursuit of the Latino vote, the mostly white pundits on MSNBC, CNN, and other networks now articulate a narrative that sows racial division by explaining Obama’s lower Latino vote percentages as evidence of racial division and tensions between African Americans and Latinos.
The 2008 election has made history with the racial and gender diversity of the Democratic Party’s presidential candidates: a white woman, Hillary Rodham Clinton; an African American man, Barack Obama; and a Latino man, Bill Richardson. From the beginning, the media have promoted a two-person contest between Clinton and Obama, virtually excluding all other candidates.
...Coverage of Richardson’s campaign reflects how the mainstream media generally cover Latinos and issues affecting Latino communities: They ignore them. The 2006 "Network Brownout Report" of the National Association of Hispanic Journalists reports that less than 1% of the national newscasts discuss Latinos, and when they do, most of the coverage is negative and revolves around crime and “illegal immigration.”
...Meanwhile the mainstream media also fail to note the many examples of Latino voters supporting African American candidates in past elections. During the 1988 presidential primary season, for example, Jesse Jackson’s Rainbow Coalition won a majority of the vote in Latino enclaves in New Mexico and a substantial minority of the vote in Latino enclaves in California.
Keep Reading...
Labels: 2008 Elections, 2008 Presidential Election, Bill Richardson, Media, Media Bias, New Mexico, NM Politics
Tuesday, March 18, 2008
SWOP homepageDigital TV Transition Disproportionately Impacts NM, Latinos and Poor
"The power to communicate and, therefore, the power to transform society belongs to everyone." CMJNielsen's study on household readiness for the Digital TV Transition, scheduled for February 18, 2009, puts NM at the wrong end of another list.
19% of Albuquerque and Santa Fe households are currently unprepared for the transition, which ranks 52 out of 56 local markets studied. (What does that mean for rural NM?)
17% of Latinos are completely unready, and 26% have one or more unready sets in their home.
Of course, cable and satellite companies are set to benefit.From the Nielsen study: The government-mandated transition will leave analog (over-the-air) broadcast TV viewers without a television signal unless they purchase digital sets, subscribe to cable or satellite, or purchase a converter box.
Adults over 55 are better prepared than younger households, and Whites and Asians are more ready than Blacks; also, more Hispanic households still rely on analog broadcast television than non-Hispanics, Nielsen said.
...The market for the converter boxes is likely to be about $1.4 billion, and for new TVs about $1.7 billion, for a total of $3.1 billion — still a relatively tiny part of the $150 billion U.S. consumer electronics market.Karlos Gauna Schmieder is SWOP's former communications organizer. He currently works as a media strategist at Center for Media Justice, based in Oakland, California.
A government program has sent out coupons worth $40 each to any U.S. household that requests them to subsidize buying a box. Each household is entitled to two coupons for the boxes, which are in stores now, start at $40 or $50, making this option easy and practically free. The government says it has funds for 33 million coupons. To get one, go to http://www.dtv2009.gov. or call 1-888-DTV-2009 (1-888-388-2009).
Labels: Digital Transition, DTV, Media, Media Bias
Saturday, February 23, 2008
SWOP homepageR.I.P. ABQ Tribune
The world of news media - particularly with traditional daily and afternoon newspapers - is fluid and chaotic as the industry struggles with its failure to keep pace with changing technologies, content production dynamics and, simply, the world around it. Ironic for an industry dealing with what's "new," no doubt.Yet, studies continue to show that public policy follows the agenda set by traditional, often corporate, press.
With the death of the Albuquerque Tribune, the state's public policy agenda is now almost solely in the hands of the Albuquerque Journal. Given the media's profound influence on how we vote, think and understand our world, today's final edition of the Trib is tough news for progressive public policy in the state.
Over the years, the Journal hasn't been shy in it's aversion to progressive voices, values and issues. (The Tribune, of course, has hardly been the champion of progressive and community voices we all would have liked, but at least it was an option when shut out of the Journal's agenda.)
Whether intentional or by default, the stories that result from such a media market tend to give voice to those in power, while marginalized voices remain voiceless.
This double-bind—serious danger combined with a lack of opportunity—faced by communities challenged by increasing corporate and private control of the democratic process, public space and the media, is something we simply cannot afford to ignore.
This double-bind can balloon exponentially given that the Journal is trying to survive in this same landscape, and will probably continue to cut costs in ways that will undoubtedly hurt its ability to give us the local in-depth coverage of public policy debates we sorely need.
And I have little faith in local TV news to be a part of the solution.
SWOPblogger, and SWOP's news magazine Voces Unidas, will continue to offer news and views from a community perspective, (so come back often!) but we all need to do more. We have to pay attention to those seemingly boring stories about news consolidation and FCC rules. And we must participate and act in the process to defend communication rights of disenfranchised communities each and every time a vote to loosen ownership rules or give more of our airwaves to less and less corporations comes up - no matter how cumbersome and disengaging the process.
Karlos Gauna Schmieder is SWOP's former communications organizer. He currently works as a media strategist at Center for Media Justice, based in Oakland, California.
Labels: Media, Media Bias
Thursday, August 09, 2007
SWOP homepageThe spin becomes the argument
Normally I don't do this, but instead of posting the beginning of the article first. I'm putting the end before the beginning. Why? Because its probably the most important piece of information. I try REALLY hard to read as much news as my brain can take...daily. But sometimes its too much. 1 line is usually what I read and decide from that line if I should continue reading it or not. Not a good habit and one I am trying to break. But don't we all do it.
How can we sit there and read every single sentence and minutia of every single article on a daily basis? It's too much. What's scary is that I always trust the 1st line. I like to consider myself a conscious person. But even still, I trust.
We need to get better at reading more and learning more about the actual issues at hand. But that's difficult to do. As the left we are way behind on the 1 liners. If you go to the Washington Post and read their headlines, you can pretty much get the gist of what is being said. If you go to the Common Dreams website....well there are many more articles that have "cool" titles, but no information.
So with that I give you the end.....and then the beginning. (in hopes that you will read it all....to get the facts.)
*****************
...this debate isn't really about making good use of federal funds. It's about using immigration as a weapon against at-risk Democrats -- and assuming voters won't bother to learn the truth.
******************
Attack Ads You'll Be Seeing
By Ruth Marcus
Wednesday, August 8, 2007; Page A15
Here's an emerging line of attack you can expect to hear more of in the 2008 congressional campaigns -- especially if you live near a vulnerable Democratic incumbent: Democrats vote to give welfare benefits to illegal aliens.
Or, even better: Democrats vote to take benefits away from deserving senior citizens to pay for welfare for illegal aliens.
Ugly? Absolutely. Devastating? So Republicans hope. True? No.
Bashing Democrats on immigration -- accusing them of doing everything but carrying illegals' luggage across the border -- is a GOP mainstay. But the accusations that Republicans started to peddle last week reached a new low in dishonest nativism.
The first salvo involved the House version of the measure to extend the children's health insurance plan, SCHIP.
"What we do is take, at the cost of seniors who get . . . choices of their own health-care plans, we take it away," former speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) claimed during the House debate. "We wipe it out, and we give it to people who are illegal aliens."
"That bill, if it becomes law, would take $197 billion out of the Medicare trust fund, from our seniors, to give to illegal aliens," charged Rep. Ron Lewis (R-Ky.).
Leave aside the inflated numbers. Leave aside the scare talk about "our seniors." (AARP, the seniors' lobby, supports the bill.)
The provision at issue would repeal a 2006 requirement that everyone applying for Medicaid provide proof of citizenship -- passports or original birth certificates. That might sound sensible, but it has been a cumbersome, expensive solution to a non-problem.
In 2005, when he was overseeing the Medicaid program for the Bush administration, Mark McClellan noted that an inspector general's investigation did "not find particular problems regarding false allegations of citizenship, nor are we aware of any."
Read the rest of the article here.
Labels: Media, Media Bias, SCHIP
Tuesday, February 06, 2007
SWOP homepageKlan's Growth No Surprise w/ Lou Dobbs and Company
There's no doubt the media should take a lot of the blame for the kkk's reported comback. They fell for the minute men's rhetoric and gave them a platform to spread hate. Lou Dobbs gets a special nod for spreading anti-immigrant propagnda on a daily basis. And Fox news is, well, Fox news.
Klan growing, fed by anti-immigrant feelings, report says
Associated Press
January 6, 2007
NEW YORK (AP) -- The Ku Klux Klan has rebounded by exploiting current
hot-button issues, especially immigration, according to a new report
released by the Anti-Defamation League.
The Klan, and other white supremacist groups like skinheads and neo-Nazis,
grew significantly more active in the past year, holding more rallies,
distributing leaflets and increasing their presence on the Internet -- much
of it focused on stirring anti-immigrant sentiment, according to the report.
"Extremist groups are good at seizing on whatever the hot button is of the
day and twisting the message to get new members," Deborah M. Lauter, ADL
Civil Rights director, said Monday. "This one seems to be taking hold with
more of mainstream America than we'd like to see." (Read the full ADL
reportexternal link)
"Klan groups have witnessed a surprising and troubling resurgence by
exploiting fears of an immigration explosion, and the debate over
immigration has, in turn, helped to fuel an increase in Klan activity, with
new groups sprouting in parts of the country that have not seen much
activity," Lauter said.
Old Klan chapters have been revived and new ones started throughout the
South, historically the heart of the group, and in other places such as
Michigan, Iowa and New Jersey, says the report.
Last May in Alabama, an anti-immigration rally included slogans such as,
"Let's get rid of the Mexicans!" according to the document, titled "Ku Klux
Klan Rebounds."
"The Klan is increasingly cooperating with other extremist groups and
Neo-Nazi groups," Lauter said. "That's a new phenomenon."
Between 2000 and 2005, hate groups mushroomed 33 percent and Klan chapters
by 63 percent, according to Mark Potok, director of the Southern Poverty Law
Center, which tracks hate crimes.
Precise data are difficult to pin down, but Potok's group counts as many as
150 Klan chapters with up to 8,000 members nationwide. More than 800 hate
groups exist around the country, Southern Poverty research shows.
Hate groups were fading in 1990s
In the late 1990s, memberships in such groups was crumbling as they lost
leaders and struggled to organize, said Brian Levin, director of the Center
for the Study of Hate and Extremism at California State University, San
Bernardino. Many hit bottom around 2000.
"Whenever you think the Klan is down and out, they find another way to
reinvent themselves," he said of the recent resurgence.
Historically, the Klan's focus had been to terrorize African-Americans --
through race riots, lynchings and other killings -- but it reached peak
membership at more than 4 million in the 1920s by focusing on immigration.
Newcomers from Ireland and Germany were portrayed as Catholic usurpers
invading the United States, taking jobs from native-born Americans and
undermining national fabric, Levin said.
Said Potok: "It's remarkable to look back at the nativist sentiments toward
Catholics -- it's very similar to what we're seeing with Mexicans now."
Today, many white supremacists blame immigrants, particularly Hispanics, for
crime, struggling schools or unemployment, for instance. With many Americans
already divided on how to revamp laws and practices to address the nation's
swelling immigrant communities, immigration "is an issue that works for hate
groups," Potok said.
A burning cross on the front lawn
Many Latinos are feeling the effects firsthand. Last September, a Kentucky
family originally from El Salvador found a wooden cross burning on their
front lawn just weeks after they moved in.
Earlier last year, a Latino teenager in Houston was brutally beaten and
sodomized while one attacker screamed "White Power!" The victim barely
survived, and one attacker was sentenced to life in prison.
"I've been doing [Hispanic advocacy work] for a long, long time and the
atmosphere has never been as poisonous as it has been in the last few
years," said Lisa Navarrete, a vice president at the National Council of La
Raza. "The level of vitriol is new."
Increasingly, fear permeates many Hispanic communities as individuals and
businesses are targeted. Last year, La Raza held a workshop at its annual
convention titled "Keeping Our Institutions Safe."
"It was very well attended, unfortunately," Navarrete said.
Copyright 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.This material may
not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Labels: Immigration, KKK, Klu Klux Klan, Lou Dobbs, Media, Media Bias, Racism


